PD James and the silence of God

James I am a mystery junkie. Often I’ve wondered why violent death and the search for whodunit so fascinates me. It wasn’t until I heard a lecture about my favourite mystery writer PD James that I found an answer (these lectures were by Wilfrid Laurie professor, Peter Erb). I think my fascination comes from trying to come to grips with the silence of God in the face of human suffering. This might sound far fetched, so let me explain.

In an interview nearly twenty years ago, James reflected on the increasing popularity of crime novels and said,

It seems to me that more and more we live in a society in which we feel our problems - be they international problems of war and peace, racial problems, problems of drugs, problems of violence - to be literally beyond our ability to solve, it seems to me very reassuring to read a popular form of fiction which itself has a problem at the heart of it. One which the reader knows will be solved by the end of the book; and not by supernatural means or good luck, but by human intelligence, human courage and human perseverance.

Interestingly, James has set out to subtly deconstruct the comforting assurance of the crime novel. She remains committed the form of the crime novel, but at the same time undermines the assumption that human intellect and rational inquiry can solve the most perplexing of problems, particularly questions about suffering and evil. Like all great writers she can entertain while also making you grapple with the deep questions of life.

At the bitter end of her latest novel, The Lighthouse, when the murder is solved, her main character, Adam Dalgliesh remarks to his subordinate Kate Miskin that, “It hasn’t been one of our successes, Kate.” What has always been implicit in James’s writing, Dalgliesh now makes explicit. While the murder may be solved, it does nothing to solve the mystery of why evil and suffering exist and continue to exert their terrible hold over humanity.

The Lighthouse, like so many of her novels, successfully highlights the grey ambiguity of our experience of the world. All of her characters carry scars, whether the lingering scars of the death of Dalgliesh’s wife and young son, or Kate Miskin’s scars from being raised by a reluctant grandmother in abject poverty, or the hidden scars beneath the polished exterior of Sergeant Benton-Smith. Her suspects carry similar marks, from an alcoholic disgraced priest, to a crippled editor, to a boatman with a violent past, to a German diplomat seeking answers for his father’s death. Even the murderer is a tragic figure, haunted by his past.

James never attempts to explain why people carry so much pain. For her the problem of suffering must always remain a problem. But she has not resigned herself to despair. In the midst of a vicious murder, Sergeant Benton-Smith finds compassion, Dalgliesh finds the capacity to love, and Kate finds momentary peace for her restless soul.

James manages to avoid simplistic answers to the problem of suffering. But she doesn’t give herself to hopelessness, either. To me, her approach seems to come out of rich, theological depths. It also seems to mirror my experience of the world as a Christian.

James was once asked if she believes in a personal God. She replied, “What I will say is that I have had in my own life personal experiences of the love of God.”

Her interviewer followed up, “Would that have been in difficult times?”

“Yes. In difficult times.”

-please don't cut and paste, this has been submitted to the MB Herald for print!

Marriage

Eugene Rogers, arguing that the married and the monk share the same vocation writes:

[M]arriage and monasticism share, not opposed, but the same ascetic end, sanctification by means of the body. Then marriage is not about satisfaction, but, precisely at its best, about yearning and anticipation of the satisfaction that it cannot provide. (Sexuality and the Christian Body, p.191)

So much thinking about marriage emphasises companionship, "one-fleshness," happiness, and bliss.  I think Rogers has a helpful corrective.  Marriage, just like all of life, must recognize the fact that we see our partner as in a glass, darkly.  We do not/cannot see each other face to face.  Thus the married are called to live in the anticipation of the final consummation of the kingdom, when we will see each other face to face. True Christian marriage must anticipate the promised final consummation of the kingdom.  We live of course, with the final consummation already confirmed in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, and that impinges upon the way in which we seek to live in marriage.  But always, we must recognize the strange loneliness of intimacy on this side of God's reign, and hope and pray for a time when we will be truly known.