Sabbatical Reseach Question
For those interested, I'm including a description of my sabbatical research proposal. I will be working on this project until Christmas. And BTW, sabbatical is wonderful! No pressures of congregational life, a quiet space in which to work, and being wonderfully free when I get home from work! I just have to figure out how to do this all the time!
Project Proposal
I am interested in the contemporary dialogue about how churches
engage and influence the society they occupy. My main interest is in Protestant congregations influenced by North
American evangelicalism.
In the contemporary dialogue, the work of theologian Stanley
Hauerwas occupies a key role. Hauerwas
combines the work of Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder and philosopher
Alistair MacIntyre. His position on this
topic can be summarized as follows:
First, he argues that the only way for the church to have
credibility is for the character of the church’s members as well as the quality
of the church’s shared life to bear direct relationship to the narratives of
Israel
and Jesus. People within the church community must display Christian virtues in order for their belief to be credible. He argues that the church is primarily about shaping people into a distinct community through the great narratives of the Bible. As such, he proposes that the church recover its place as a "counter-cultural” community.
Second, in contrast to the social gospel and liberal Protestantism,
he argues that rather than proposing a universal ethic for a society, the
church ought to remain a witness to the “trueness” of their foundational
narratives through the character of their life. They ought to separate themselves from the “liberal” values of society
and expose its inner problems.
Third, Hauerwas tries to distinguish his approach from
sectarianism. He argue that the church
should resist the urge to withdraw, but instead through the character of its
life be a witnessing community that offers an alternative to those alienated by
the forces within contemporary society.
In summary, Hauerwas argues that only through the recovery
of a counter-cultural ethic, shaped by the narratives of the Bible and divorced
from the values of modern society, can the church present a faithful and
credible witness and in fact be a valuable contributor to society.
Personal Engagment with the Research Topic
I would characterize my own theological approach as similar
to that of Hauerwas. However, increasingly
I am experiencing dissonance between my theological commitments and the
realities of pastoral ministry and congregational life. I would characterize three main points of
tension:
First, in the face of Hauerwas’ desire to have the church to
be a community shaped by the narrative of
Israel
and Jesus, I am acutely aware that people cannot be primarily shaped by only one narrative (even the so-called Christian one). People in congregations are shaped by a multiplicity of different and sometimes competing forces. I wonder if it is even a useful project to try and shape a people with a common identity and character.
Second, I can characterize the most difficult aspect of my
job as negotiating the vastly different definitions that individual church
members have of “the Christian story” and what Christian character and virtue
looks like. In my congregation there is
no consensus on what Christian characters and virtues are.
Third, my own reading of the New Testament reveals that the
heart of Christianity is not a question of developing character or certain
virtues. Nor is it identifying right and
wrong belief. Rather, in my opinion, the
New Testament is a redemptive story that reveals the underlying problems with
the human condition and offers a way to deal with those problems. Thus, Hauerwas’ emphasis on character and
virtue seems to ignore the more foundational themes of the New Testament.
Fourth, I have observed that speaking of the church as
counter-culture can lead to people withdrawing from real social engagement, and
instead merely decrying all the ways in which the culture is no longer
“Christian.” My desire as a pastor is to
help the church promote critical societal engagement and responsible
citizenship. I worry that Hauerwas’ view
moves in the opposite direction.
Method
I am proposing a three-pronged approach to exploring these
questions. First, I will read a
representative sample of Hauerwas’ work to gain a better sense of how the
church ought to engage and influence the society it occupies. Second, I will evaluate the work of people
who are trying to apply Hauerwas’ views to concrete, pastoral and
congregational settings. I will then
evaluate those applications and see if they have a reasonable chance of success
if carefully applied. Really, I am
interested to discover if Hauerwas’ theories are able to be applied in
congregational settings. And finally, I
would like to gain an appreciation for the major critiques of Hauerwas’ views
and see if they match my own.
Reading List
Carter, Craig A. Rethinking Christ and Culture: A
Post-Christendom Perspective.
Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2006.
Rodney Clapp, A Peculiar People: The Church as Culture in a
Post-Christian Society.
Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1996.
Hauerwas, Stanley. A Community of Character. Notre Dame:
Hauerwas, Stanley. The Peaceable Kingdom. Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press, 1991.
Hauerwas, Stanley. After Christendom. .Notre Dame: Abingdon
Press, 1991.
Hauerwas, Stanley and William Williom. Resident Aliens. Nashville:
Abingdon, 1989.
Hauerwas, Stanley. The Hauerwas Reader. Durham:
Duke University Press, 2001.
Huebner, Chris. A Precarious Peace: Yoderian Explorations on
Theology, Knowledge and Identity. Scottsdale:
Herald Press, 2006.
Kennison, Phil. Life
on the Vine: Cultivating the Fruit of the Spirit in Christian Community. Downers Grove:
InterVarsity Press, October 1999.
Stout, Jeffrey. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2004.
Hey David. Glad you are enjoying the sabbatical. I love the question and issues you are addressing in your reading and reflection. I would be interested in following your progress as you reflect. Hopefully you will post more here on your blog.
Say Hi to Alison and the family.
James
By the way, we welcomed baby #3 a few weeks ago. Carly Grace.
Posted by: James | 15 November 2007 at 04:00 PM